jueves, 11 de junio de 2009

Quasicrystals In Nature
Search turns up oddly ordered crystalline grains in Al-Cu-Fe minerals
Mitch Jacoby












In the 25 years since quasiperiodic crystals were first proposed to exist, scientists have observed and studied more than 100 examples of these oddly ordered materials. All of them were synthesized in laboratories—until now.

An international research team has found a quasicrystal in a naturally occurring mineral sample originating in Russia (Science 2009, 324, 1306). The finding broadens the range of natural atomic structures and could provide clues that lead scientists to synthesize new kinds of quasicrystals.

Quasicrystals are ordered solids that lack periodicity, meaning their structures cannot be depicted by a geometric pattern of atoms that repeats in three dimensions at fixed intervals—a description of ordinary crystals. Typically built from multicomponent alloys, quasicrystals often exhibit five- or 10-fold rotational symmetry, a condition that's theoretically forbidden in conventional crystallography.

After years of searching, Luca Bindi of the Museum of Natural History, in Florence, Italy, and Princeton University's Paul J. Steinhardt and coworkers Peter J. Lu and Nan Yao discovered fivefold symmetry in micrometer-sized quasicrystal grains in samples of khatyrkite and cupalite. The Al-Cu-Fe-based mineral specimens in the Florence museum are reported to have come from the Koryak Mountains in Russia.

"Only because of Luca's stubborn determination and willingness to test every part of the sample was the quasicrystal found. It's a miracle, really," Steinhardt says.

Source: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/87/i23/8723news4.html
Future Of Metals
Developing sustainable supplies of metals will rely on smart product design and more efficient recycling
Stephen K. Ritter




LITHIUM POND Lithium-laden brine evaporates at Chemetall’s Salar de Atacama site in Chile, one of the world’s largest lithium mines.


Could metals become extinct? That question has popped up in magazine articles and in the blogosphere in response to predictions by several scientists—taken out of context—that some metals running up against high demand and low supply could go the way of the dinosaurs.

Metals can’t really become extinct because their atoms are immutable, at least under most conditions. But it’s not such a farfetched idea that as world population and the average standard of living increase, some metals could become unavailable for new uses.

That realization is inspiring some scientists and economists to develop forward-thinking approaches to achieving sustainable cycles of metal use—that is, a continuous supply loop of a metal that runs from starting material to product to end-of-life recycling and back to starting material, with minor additions of virgin metal as needed to balance any inevitable processing losses.

“Metals have limits in the same way that crude oil and clean water do,” observes Yale University’s Thomas E. Graedel, an industrial ecologist who has been exploring natural resource limits for many years. Graedel and his colleagues’ analyses of the supply and demand of metals has led them to an understanding that if current consumer trends continue, the supply of some metals will soon become strongly limited unless action is taken.

“It means we need to develop sustainable in-use stocks of metals,” Graedel says. Maintaining these perpetual metal supplies will require smarter product design that “allows us to continue to achieve the high performance of materials that we desire but ensures efficient metal recycling,” he adds.

The chemistry enterprise actually doesn’t use much metal day-to-day, Graedel notes. Metals primarily are consumed by manufacturing industries. But chemists and chemical engineers still have a leading role to play in the future of metals by designing products and developing processes that are ultimately responsible for how global metal resources are extracted, processed, and used.

Graedel and his colleagues have been assessing the amount of unmined metals, metals in current use, and metals disposed of as waste. Of the elements they have examined, they have singled out copper, zinc, and platinum as endangered species whose supplies could be in trouble before the end of the century. Other scientists have pinpointed gallium, indium, and hafnium as potentially running short, possibly within the next decade.

These metals are being extracted from Earth and put into service at rates faster than they are being recycled, Graedel says. In some cases there is more of the metal already in use above the ground than there is left in the ground.

That’s not necessarily bad news, Graedel says. For some metals it could mean eventually running out of sources to mine and moving toward full dependence on recycled metals. On the basis of his group’s calculations, Graedel concludes that the in-use stocks of the most commonly used metals—aluminum, copper, iron, lead, and zinc—would have to increase three to nine times their current amounts to satisfy the wants and needs of the global population and reach the critical mass that could support the sustainable cycling that he is advocating.

Preparing for potential limits on metal availability will require a new level of up-front decision-making, Graedel adds. For example, engineers may not want to design an electronic device that will keep a particular metal tied up in a single application for a long time if we know that metal could end up in short supply, he says.

As for recycling, Graedel suggests that cities will become “anthropogenic mines” for metals that are no longer in service. “Our problem is that we aren’t very good at extracting the metals from these urban mines because they come disguised as computers, automobiles, and buildings,” Graedel says. “We need to do a better job of grabbing those metals for recycling, which means we need to be doing a better job of product design to allow for this recovery. Metal shortages are going to push us to become more innovative designers and more efficient recyclers.”

The chemical, petroleum, and pharmaceutical industries already have set the standard for recycling metals when it comes to platinum group metal (PGM) catalysts. PGM catalysts, which include platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, and iridium, are high-value commodities with relatively long life cycles, notes Christian Hagelüken, business development and marketing manager of Umicore Precious Metals Refining, in Hoboken, Belgium, the world’s leading PGM recycler.

When an industrial catalyst needs to be replaced, the catalyst owner ships the material to Umicore or another recycler to be refined, Hagelüken explains. The recovered PGMs are used to produce new catalyst, which is returned to the customer. This type of business-to-business closed-loop recycling guarantees very little metal drops out of service—only a residual amount is lost in the catalytic process or in the reprocessing, Hagelüken says.

This closed system works well for a captive application like high-value industrial catalysts, but most other materials recycled for their metals are consumer products characterized by an open-loop recycling structure, Hagelüken says. In the latter case the product, such as a computer or a car and its catalytic converter, often has multiple handlers or owners during its life cycle with no clear responsibility or incentive for anyone to recycle the metal.

Although effective recycling technologies exist to handle these materials, most of them still don’t make it into the recycling stream and break the loop. For example, only about 50% of PGMs from automobile catalysts are recovered, primarily because of a lack of appropriate end-of-life management, Hagelüken notes. The remaining 50% represents an important source of metal supply, if it can be captured, he says. In a more compelling example, the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that in the U.S. only 18% of electronics such as TVs and computers and only 10% of cell phones are currently recycled to recover PGMs, gold, silver, and other metals.

For its part, Umicore has developed a state-of-the-art integrated smelter-refinery to process PGMs and other metals. The facility processes about 1,000 metric tons per day of a mix of industrial PGMs and other catalysts, catalytic converters, computer circuit boards, cell phones, precious-metal-containing smelter by-products, and more.

These materials, which come in from chemical and car companies, metallurgical plants, and commercial recyclers, are first individually milled and assayed to determine the exact metal content. The material is then mixed with other recyclables in a giant smelter, which is fired up to 1,200 °C to create a molten mix of metals. A subsequent series of chemical and physical steps separates and purifies the metals.

Major products like copper, lead, and nickel are separated early in the process and can be sold on the open metals market. The process stream continues through additional metallurgical machinations to refine 14 other metals including the PGMs, gold, silver, selenium, tellurium, and indium. Metals such as PGMs from industrial catalysts that are in a closed-loop process are returned to the owner. Umicore, which is a leading manufacturer of PGM catalysts and other metal products, uses other recovered metals as raw material or sells them.

The volume of PGMs currently in use remains small, Hagelüken says, adding up to a total of about 2,700 metric tons in cars and 1,000 metric tons in catalysts and other applications. Some 500 metric tons of new PGMs are produced each year from mines located primarily in Russia and South Africa. That volume makes it easier to operate in a closed-loop format, he notes.

Hagelüken would like to see the closed-loop model extended to include a host of other materials, including car catalytic converters, consumer electronics, and emerging areas such as photovoltaic solar cells, fuel cells, and electric car batteries. Improving closed-loop recycling will also head off inefficient and hazardous roadside or backyard recycling taking place in developing countries in Africa and Asia, he adds.

“Building up a more sustainable society with the help of technology depends to a large extent on sufficient access to technology metals,” Hagelüken says. “Because of the low relative abundance of these metals and their high cost, it’s necessary to establish effective recycling systems to preserve our limited metal resources.”

Some ideas Hagelüken has put forth to possibly accelerate adoption of closed-loop recycling include financial incentives such as leasing or placing deposits on the products or on the metals in catalytic converters, cell phones, computers, and televisions. Such steps, he says, could ensure the metals will enter end-of-life processing and emerge for another go-around.

While PGMs offer a proven example of managing metals on a small scale, lithium could be the model for successfully managing a metal on a large scale. Although lithium has many uses—in ceramics and glass, lubricating greases, organolithium reagents for pharmaceuticals and polymer production, and small rechargeable batteries—the application on most people’s minds these days is the next-generation replacement of nickel metal hydride battery packs in hybrid-electric cars.

The sudden production of lithium batteries for millions of cars—which require about 10 lb of lithium per battery pack—could dishevel the lithium supply chain. But in an effort to head off potential problems, lithium mining companies, battery producers, and automakers have been working together to thoroughly analyze lithium availability and future recyclability before adopting new lithium-ion chemistries, notes Brian W. Jaskula, a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientist who tracks lithium, gallium, and beryllium supply and demand. At the latest meeting among these lithium stakeholders in Santiago, Chile, in January, there was consensus that there will be enough lithium to meet demand for car batteries with plenty of room to spare, Jaskula says.

Globally, some 17.7 million metric tons of minable lithium reserves are known, according to the latest USGS figures, with about 9.4 million metric tons of that amount economically accessible with current technology. The current global leaders of lithium reserves include Chile with 7.5 million metric tons, Bolivia with 5.4 million metric tons, Argentina with 2.2 million metric tons, and China with 1.1 million metric tons.

Today’s global lithium production for all uses, approximately 27,000 metric tons per year according to USGS numbers, barely registers as a blip against the total, Jaskula says. Even if demand doubles several times in the coming decades, there will be enough lithium available, possibly without tapping any new mining sites and even without recycling, which is currently more expensive than obtaining new stocks of the metal, he points out.

Most lithium is obtained from underground brine pools in remote desert regions, Jaskula explains. For example, in Chile lithium brines reside just under the surface of the Salar de Atacama, a vast salt flat in the northern part of the country.

Water from the slopes of the Andes Mountains percolates under the surface of the salar, dissolving lithium, potassium, and other salts. To produce lithium, the brine, containing about 2,200 ppm of lithium, is pumped into aboveground ponds where the water evaporates in the desert sun and extraneous minerals precipitate out, Jaskula says. The resulting concentrated lithium slush is then trucked to a processing plant where the lithium is converted to Li2CO3 for making battery electrode materials or to LiOH and LiCl for other applications.

Like with other natural resources, making the connection between known resources and the actual amount of that material that can economically be extracted and utilized is difficult, and misinformation can be rampant, Jaskula says. For example, global energy economists just last year were hailing Bolivia as the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” because the country’s Salar de Uyuni, just across the border from Chile, was thought to possess 50% of global lithium reserves. However, those numbers were recently revised, Jaskula notes, reanointing Chile as the world leader.

So far, because of a lack of infrastructure, none of Bolivia’s lithium is even being produced commercially, he says. It will take years before Bolivia will be able to produce lithium, Jaskula says, and by then Bolivia could “end up missing the lithium express.”

Lithium’s current overabundance is rare in the world of metals. Should some metals from traditional mining sources become scarce, there is a fail safe option in the form of the vast untapped resource of metals available in the oceans.

“The Earth is a metal-rich rock,” says geologist Maurice A. Tivey of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). “I can’t see the human race running out of metals when it will be possible to mine in new places or recycle or simply reduce consumption,” he says. “We probably won’t be able to live on the planet due to global warming or other environmental problems before we run into a metal supply problem.”

Tivey, who studies the deep-sea environment, is part of a community of scientists, mining company representatives, and government officials who met at WHOI in April to keep an eye on the prospects of mining metal sulfide deposits that have formed at deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the oceans. Water seeps into the seafloor through cracks along the mid-ocean ridges and becomes heated at these volcanically active boundaries of Earth’s tectonic plates, Tivey explains. The resulting hydrothermal fluid, as acidic as stomach acid and up to 400 °C, gushes out of the vent openings like a geyser, carrying with it dissolved minerals. As the fluid cools near the surface and is ejected into the ocean, metal sulfides precipitate out and form chimneys and mounds that contain iron, copper, zinc, and lead, with trace amounts of gold, silver, and a dozen other metals.

“We have found some 300 hydrothermal vent systems—dead or alive—on the seafloor,” Tivey says. Of these, only about 100 host metal sulfide deposits, he says. The largest deposit is in the Red Sea, with an estimated 90 million metric tons of ore, which is comparable to an average-sized ore deposit on land.

What makes the seafloor attractive for mining is the “open access” of the deposits, Tivey notes. They are right on the seafloor, compared with digging through kilometers of rock on land, he says. Technology developed by oil firms for deep-water drilling and remotely operated vehicles developed for scientific exploration of the deep ocean are making mining in these deep-sea settings feasible. But he and his colleagues want the mining industry to proceed cautiously to preserve the exotic life around the hydrothermal vents, which includes giant clams, superlong tubeworms, and eyeless shrimp.

Besides metal sulfide deposits, another intriguing deep-sea metal resource is manganese nodules. These golf-ball- to tennis-ball-size lumps lie in the sediment scattered over vast swaths of the central Pacific Ocean and in smaller areas of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. The nodules form over millions of years by slow precipitation of metals from the water above and the water-logged sediment below.

Manganese is the principal metal in the nodules, making up about 18% of the average nodule, followed by iron at about 12% and by small amounts of nickel, copper, cobalt, zinc, and a handful of other elements. Even so, the amount of manganese, nickel, and cobalt in the nodules is estimated to exceed the total amount of known metal deposits on dry land. The problem with nodules, which could be picked up from the seafloor like snatching up marbles, is that they are three miles or more under water.

Although metal sulfides and manganese nodules might not be economical for recovering metals right now, nor may it ever be environmentally wise, the consolation prize is in knowing that there are metals out there if humanity fails in its attempts to develop sustainable flows of metals and aboveground metal “extinction” ever truly becomes a reality.


Source: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/87/8723sci1.html

sábado, 30 de mayo de 2009




Nanotechnology
DNA In Another Dimension
3-D construction technique creates a wealth of structures
Bethany Halford


USING DNA as a basic chemical building block rather than a genetic molecule, scientists have devised a method for creating complex three-dimensional nanostructures with precisely controlled dimensions that range from 10 to 100 nm (Nature 2009, 459, 414). The strategy of self-assembly could provide a general route for manufacturing sophisticated devices with nanoscale features, the researchers say.

The technique, developed by William M. Shih of Boston's Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and colleagues, is an extension of DNA origami, in which hundreds of short oligonucleotides fasten to a long single strand of DNA in such a way that it folds into a predetermined shape (C&EN, March 20, 2006, page 10). Researchers have already used the technique to create 2-D snowflakes and smiley faces, as well as a 3-D DNA box (C&EN, May 11, page 30). Shih's strategy allows nanotechnologists to build a vast diversity of 3-D DNA structures, a capability his group demonstrated by constructing a tiny railed bridge, a genie bottle, and an icosahedron.

Shih's team designs the structures by computationally "carving" them out of a honeycomb lattice made of a DNA double helix. Using computer-aided design, they arrange a single strand of DNA so that it winds around that carved structure and then determine what short oligonucleotides are required to hold it in place.

"The challenge was actually getting it to work," Shih tells C&EN, because DNA is negatively charged, and repulsive forces tend to keep it from packing into the compact sculptures. "We didn't know what kind of tricks we would need to get it to fold correctly," he says. Ultimately, patience proved to be one of the tricks. Although most 2-D DNA origami structures fold within an hour, Shih's 3-D sculptures take about a week to fold.

"This successful move into three dimensions heralds a new era for the field of structural DNA technology," writes Duke University chemistry professor Thomas H. LaBean in a commentary that accompanies the paper. "Through the ages, some of the most iconic and lasting artifacts of human ingenuity have been sculptures and carvings, created from a wide variety of materials. But until now, a general purpose material from which nanometer-scale, three-dimensional shapes could be made has been lacking."


Source :http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/87/i21/8721notw6.html

miércoles, 13 de mayo de 2009




Quantum Dots That Don't Blink
Core structure suppresses blinking and leads to unusual spectral behavior
Celia Henry Arnaud

A team of scientists has synthesized semiconductor nanocrystals, or quantum dots, that are "nonblinking," in that they emit light steadily. Such behavior has long been a goal of scientists working with quantum dots and should improve the usefulness of the nanocrystals for biological labeling applications by increasing the number of photons the particles emit.


Ted Palwicki
View Enlarged Image

NO BLINKING Quantum dots with a gradient core emit continuously and at multiple wavelengths.Blinking is a hallmark of fluorescent single molecules and nanometer-scale crystals; it occurs because the luminescence intermittently turns off even with continuous excitation. Excited quantum dots get rid of their extra energy through radiative processes—by emitting light—or nonradiative processes. "When the dot blinks off, nonradiative processes are winning," says team leader Todd D. Krauss, associate professor of chemistry at the University of Rochester. In quantum dots, this blinking is thought to be the result of extra charges that enhance nonradiative decay.

Krauss's team eliminates the blinking by making quantum dots whose compositions gradually change from the center to the shell (Nature, DOI: 10.1038/nature08072). They layer ZnSe on top of a CdSe core, anneal the layers, and deposit additional ZnSe around it. The process generates a ternary core with a radial composition gradient that smooths the particle's potential energy function and makes nonradiative processes less efficient.

However, the nonblinking comes with unusual spectral behavior. Quantum dots usually have a single, sharp emission peak. The new quantum dots, in contrast, have multiple peaks in their emission spectra. Multiple peaks might mean emission spectra of different quantum dots will overlap, which could complicate their use as biological sensors. The extra peaks come from part of the quantum dots' excitation energy being emitted as photons at longer wavelengths. In addition, the time the unblinking quantum dots stay in their excited state before emitting a photon is much shorter than that of traditional CdSe nanocrystals.

Krauss and coworkers, including Alexander L. Efros of the Naval Research Laboratory, posit that both the suppressed blinking and the unusual spectral characteristics can be explained by the lower efficiency nonradiative processes caused by the composition gradient. "Nonradiative processes become efficient only when you have very sharply defined potential barriers," Krauss says, and the gradient rounds off the corners of the potential energy function. Krauss plans to test their model of quantum dot behavior by varying the materials and sizes of nonblinking quantum dots.

Jennifer Hollingsworth, a chemist at Los Alamos National Laboratory who also is developing nonblinking quantum dots, comments that the work by Krauss and coworkers is "certainly an interesting addition" to earlier studies by two groups, including hers, that reported having significantly suppressed but not completely eliminated blinking in semiconductor nanocrystals. "It will be important to see whether they will be able to extend this approach to other systems and whether this thin-shell motif will hold up to processing."

Source: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/87/i20/8720news4.html



The Kilogram Isn't What It Used to Be—It's Lighter

by Dava Sobel
From the March 2009 issue, published online March 8, 2009


iStockphoto
Sèvres Cedex, France—What I love best about the kilogram is its tangibility, its solid, sculpted form of shiny platinum and iridium. I’m referring to not just any kilogram but the quintessential one that resides here—the actual International Prototype Kilogram, or IPK, created in 1879 as the official standard of mass. It’s a smooth cylinder of alloy, only an inch and a half high and an inch and a half in diameter. Though petite, the IPK is necessarily dense; it weighs 2.2046 pounds. If you went to pick it up, you might think someone had cemented it to the tabletop for a prank. Even if you knew what to expect, its compact heft would still boggle your senses.

Of course, they won’t let you pick it up. They won’t even let you anywhere near it. If you touched it—if you so much as breathed on it—you would change its mass, and then where would we be? That’s why the IPK leads such a sheltered life. It is kept under a triple bell jar inside a temperature- and humidity-controlled vault in a secure room within the Parc de Saint-Cloud enclave of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, or BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures). Thus protected, it reigns over a world’s worth of measurement. Every hill of beans, every lump of coal, every milligram of medication—in short, every quantity of any substance that can be weighed—must be gauged against this object.

The IPK is, in and of itself, the International System of Units’ definition of mass. Through a complex dissemination protocol, the essence of the kilogram is transferred from the IPK to its counterparts at standards laboratories around the world, and from there to centers of industry and scientific research, ending up in grocery stores, post offices, and bathrooms everywhere.


Although I have come to pay my re-spects to the IPK, I am denied even a glimpse of the thing. Nor can I see one of its six official copies, for these reside alongside the prototype in guarded seclusion. I must content myself with replicas —with the working standards that fill the ultraclean laboratory of Richard Davis, an American physicist in Paris who for the past 15 years has headed the Mass Section at the BIPM.

Gloved for work, Davis wears a lab coat over his street clothes, blue paper bootees over his shoes, and a net over his hair. Around him kilogram weights of various shapes and materials sit on colored plates under glass bell jars, like an assortment of fine cheeses. They have been delivered here from other countries to be reckoned in comparison with the IPK.

“That one belongs to Ireland,” Davis says, indicating a stainless-steel kilogram on a red dish. Member states—signatories to the Meter Convention—pay dues to the BIPM that cover the cost of periodic checks on their national reference standards.

It takes a minimum of four days to calibrate a single kilogram according to the BIPM’s cautious regimen of repeated comparison weighings. Visiting kilograms could theoretically go home after a week, but they typically stay in the lab for months, allowing the time it takes them to become thermally stable in their new surroundings, undergo cleaning by the BIPM method, and prove themselves, through repeated trials, to be worthy ambassadors of mass. Given the uncertainty, however minuscule, in every measurement, such repetitions are essential before these national standards can leave with a calibration certificate stating how they compare with the IPK, along with a precise correction factor.

En route to or from Paris, the visiting kilograms disdain ordinary transport. Zeina Jabbour, group leader of Mass & Force at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Maryland, recently brought two of the four U.S. kilograms here for calibration. She carried one herself in a specially designed case inside a padded camera bag that was all but handcuffed to her wrist, and she entrusted the other to a colleague who flew on a different plane. (“That way, if something happened to one of us.”) Soon after her flight touched down at Charles de Gaulle, she grabbed a taxi straight to the BIPM on the other side of the city for a handover directly to Davis.

Before picking up a kilogram with a pair of widemouthed forceps called lifters, Davis flicks off suspected specks of dust with a fine-tipped brush. (“My wife paints.”) He has modified the artist’s brush for his purposes by degreasing its fibers and covering its metal ferrule with plastic, “so if you accidentally hit the kilogram, you won’t scratch it.” On a balance precise to 10 decimal places, a scratch counts.

Davis tests the Irish kilogram in a sealed chamber against three BIPM working standards that are also made of stainless steel. He doesn’t weigh it against the platinum-iridium standard, since stainless weights are only one-third as dense, and therefore three times as large, displacing a much greater quantity of air. “You’d have to make an air buoyancy correction that would amount to almost a tenth of a gram,” he explains. “That is huge.”

Although Davis serves as the IPK’s official guardian, even he rarely sees the original prototype, which is too precious and vulnerable to damage to remain in constant use. Over the course of its century-plus lifetime, the IPK has emerged only three times to serve “campaigns” of active duty, most recently in 1988–1992, when it participated in a formal verification of all kilogram prototypes belonging to the 51 Meter Convention member states. On that occasion, however, the IPK itself was found wanting. Despite all the protective protocols and delicate procedures, it had mysteriously changed. No one can say whether the IPK has lost weight (perhaps by the gradual escape of gases trapped inside it from the start) or if most of the prototypes have gained (possibly by accumulating atmospheric contaminants). The difference is approximately 30 micrograms —30 billionths of a kilogram—in a hundred years. (Imagine 30 cents out of a $10 million stack of pennies.)


Source: http://discovermagazine.com/2009/mar/08-kilogram-isn.t-what-it-used-to-be-it.s-lighter

domingo, 3 de mayo de 2009



WHAT IS WEB 2.0?

by Daniel Lewis

Web 2.0 is what the Web is turning into. It is a revolutionary step forward, including not just what Web sites look like, but methods of interaction, styles of development, and sources of content. This article discusses the Web 2.0 concept and characteristics.

One of the main ideas behind Web 2.0 is usability. Web 2.0 applications tend to look more like desktop applications than Web pages: they have simple interfaces with plain colors and no busy patterns, logos, or animation. Moreover, they provide a richness of interaction previously found only in desktop applications. How is this possible? It's not just talented graphic artists, but perhaps how the applications are developed...

Web 2.0 systems are developed by creative programmers using development frameworks such as Ruby On Rails (for the Ruby programming language) and Django (for the Python programming language), or families of technologies like AJAX. The developers favor dynamic languages because they enable fast development, debugging, and deployment. Compare this to compiled, static languages, which tend to require more time to develop and are more complex to deploy. Dynamic programming languages also allow data and information to flow through the Web system easily, providing dynamic content.

Dynamic content is another important force behind Web 2.0. Information can be gathered from multiple sources in real time and assembled on a single Web page. But where does the information come from? Often users of a site create the content themselves. This comes in many forms, including:

Blogging, or Web logging, which is like an online diary or news feed.
Syndication, a concept similar to blogging except that information does not need to be viewed on a Web page.
Resource sharing, which allows users to share their favorite Web links and other resources using descriptive words called tags. Example systems include del.icio.us and bibsonomy.org.
Similarly, topical information sharing is an open, collaborative approach to content generation that is typical of Web 2.0. The quintessential example of a topical information sharing system is the wiki (pronounced "wick-ee"). Wikis at first glance look like standard Web pages, but if you look carefully, you see that it is possible for any user to edit these pages. The most famous wiki is Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that anyone can edit or add to.

Tim O'Reilly, the originator of the Web 2.0 concept, gives examples of Web 1.0 systems and ideas versus Web 2.0 systems and ideas [3]:

Web 1.0 Web 2.0
DoubleClick Google AdSense
Ofoto Flickr
Akamai BitTorrent
mp3.com Napster
Britannica Online Wikipedia
personal websites blogging
Evite upcoming.org and EVDB
domain name speculation search engine optimization
page views cost per click
screen scraping Web services
publishing participation
content management systems wikis
directories (taxonomy) tagging ("folksonomy")
stickiness syndication

As Web 2.0 systems emerge and develop, they are bringing desktop programs to the Web, to the point that desktop applications may be replaced by the Internet browser . We can already replace Word with Writely.com and Excel with Google Spreadsheet. We may eventually be able to replace Photoshop or GIMP with Pixoh.com.

There are a few potential problems to look out for though, as Web 2.0 takes shape. Chief among these is the loss of structure that could occur if Web developers focus exclusively on presenting data in human-oriented formats. The data can become messy and unreadable for machine users, hiding important or interesting information and making automation of tasks difficult. But the sheer numbers of Web 2.0 services already available show that it is time to upgrade the system.

For further detail and discussion, Paul Graham presents an interesting review of the technology [2]. There is also a Web 2.0 site that checks to see if other websites could be claimed as Web 2.0 [1]. Or check out an alternative view of Web 2.0 and its possible successor in [4].


Source: http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds13-1/web20.html
New Molecules In Space
Discovery of two complex compounds hints at more chemical diversity lurking in space
Steve Ritter

AN INTERNATIONAL research team has peered into a gaseous cloud at the heart of the Milky Way galaxy and detected ethyl formate and n-propyl cyanide, two of the most complex organic molecules ever observed outside our solar system. On the basis of spectroscopic evidence and computer models of how the molecules were formed, the scientists believe that molecules with even greater chemical complexity are waiting to be discovered in space.

One of those molecules is glycine, the simplest amino acid, which has eluded detection thus far. Glycine is similar in size and complexity to the two new compounds, and its presence would help confirm suspicions that prebiotic chemistry exists beyond our solar system.

Team member Robin T. Garrod, an astrochemist at Cornell University, announced the discovery on behalf of the team on April 21 during the European Week of Astronomy & Space Science at the University of Hertfordshire, in England. The study is also being reported in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics (DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811550).

Commenting on the discovery, astrochemist Steven B. Charnley of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, in Greenbelt, Md., tells C&EN that detecting these compounds should help shed new light on how complex molecules are formed in space and "gives impetus to future searches for higher amino acids, as well as for nucleobases and their heterocyclic precursors."

The researchers used millimeter-wavelength spectroscopy to study a dense cloud of gas and icy dust particles in the star-forming region Sagittarius B2. This particular spot in the universe has been a treasure trove of many different types of small organic molecules (C&EN, June 16, 2008, page 58). Even so, detecting ethyl formate and n-propyl cyanide was difficult for the scientists because the 36 spectral lines they assigned to the two compounds were hidden in a forest of 3,700 overlapping spectral lines from the many molecules detected.

The study supports the idea that larger and more complex molecules like ethyl formate and n-propyl cyanide form stepwise on the surface of dust grains by tacking a functional group onto a building block formed from an existing molecule, rather than by adding atoms sequentially, Garrod says. This process appears to be limitless, "so there's good reason to expect even more complex organic molecules to be out there, if we can detect them," he adds


Source: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/87/i17/8717notw3.html